[Olsr-users] olsrd2 with vmware,
Thu Mar 12 16:36:12 CET 2015
For now, I don't need it since we are in feasibility phase.
When we get into the project, I hope we can contribute more.
On Thursday, March 12, 2015, Henning Rogge <(spam-protected)> wrote:
> it is... I am working on a fix in the "explicit_route_removal" branch
> of the OONF repository.
> It should already work, but there are a few error messages that still
> have to be handled better.
> Without this branch IPv6 will not work well unless you have a very
> recent kernel (3.10 like on openwrt barrier breaker seems to work).
> Henning Rogge
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Taner Kurtulus <(spam-protected)
> > Hi Heinning,
> > I understand,
> > Here is the version of my system CentOS 6.5 x64, Kernel version :
> > 2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64
> > It's quite old version I think.
> > Best regards,
> > On Thursday, March 12, 2015, Henning Rogge <(spam-protected)
> >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Taner Kurtulus <(spam-protected)
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi Henning,
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for the bug fix. Now it works as expected.
> >> > However, for only one time it didn't work, but couldn't reproduce
> >> > If
> >> > I reproduce, I will let you know. In that situation, what kind of log
> >> > would
> >> > you like me to send?
> >> > By the way, I checked with the command you sent me and everything was
> >> > seemed correct.
> >> Difficult to say...
> >> one nasty thing I discovered a few days ago is that there is no
> >> "atomic route replacement" for IPv6 with "not recent kernels"... I
> >> know the problem is there with current Debian Stable, but not with
> >> current Ubuntu. I am working on fixing the issue, but its a bit
> >> complicated.
> >> but it means the kernel version might be important too at the moment.
> >> Henning Rogge
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Olsr-users