[Olsr-users] [Olsr-dev] olsrd 0.6.6.1 (and earlier) ipv6 problems
Sat Mar 29 15:18:22 CET 2014
What I have *is* dynamic.
What is missing in OpenVPN: float. With float, the tunnel doesn't depend on smartgateway or whatever, the tunnel would survive changing attachment points. Float is in 2.4 (I hope).
Op 29 mrt. 2014, om 07:33 heeft Russell Senior <(spam-protected)> het volgende geschreven:
> We could switch to a static routing regime, but olsr is (has been) nice for handling it all dynamically for us.
> Is this limitation in olsr we have encountered correctable in the near term, or should we be looking at converting to static routes?
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Teco Boot <(spam-protected)> wrote:
> Running a MANET protocol over a VPN hub&spoke infrastructure is not something I recommend. On hub, all TC messages are pushed on all tunnels. Can introduce problems when packet rate isn't shaped.
> What we have is a VPN tunnel for each OLSR router. On spokes, RFC1918 routes go into the tunnel. Hub has /24 routes back, generated from certificate. Scales very well.
> Op 28 mrt. 2014, om 14:54 heeft Ferry Huberts <(spam-protected)> het volgende geschreven:
> > On 28/03/14 10:34, Henning Rogge wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I must admit that I am not convinced that its an Olsrd bug what we are seeing...
> >> If I see it correctly Olsrd is running over the VPN interface
> >> connection (interface name "vpn"), right?
> >> Is the VPN connection between the nodes still active during the route
> >> loss? Most of the nodes seem to have direct connections and the "30
> >> seconds until recovery" sounds like an ETX value slowly going down and
> >> then dropping the link.
> > 30 seconds is also something we see when our vpn connections break...
> > --
> > Olsr-users mailing list
> > (spam-protected)
> > https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Olsr-users