[Olsr-users] [Olsr-dev] olsrd 0.6.6.1 (and earlier) ipv6 problems

[Russell Senior]

We could switch to a static routing regime, but olsr is (has been) nice for
handling it all dynamically for us.

Is this limitation in olsr we have encountered correctable in the near
term, or should we be looking at converting to static routes?

Thanks!


On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Teco Boot <(spam-protected)> wrote:

> Running a MANET protocol over a VPN hub&spoke infrastructure is not
> something I recommend. On hub, all TC messages are pushed on all tunnels.
> Can introduce problems when packet rate isn't shaped.
>
> What we have is a VPN tunnel for each OLSR router. On spokes, RFC1918
> routes go into the tunnel. Hub has /24 routes back, generated from
> certificate. Scales very well.
>
> Teco
>
> Op 28 mrt. 2014, om 14:54 heeft Ferry Huberts <(spam-protected)> het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> >
> >
> > On 28/03/14 10:34, Henning Rogge wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I must admit that I am not convinced that its an Olsrd bug what we are
> seeing...
> >>
> >> If I see it correctly Olsrd is running over the VPN interface
> >> connection (interface name "vpn"), right?
> >>
> >> Is the VPN connection between the nodes still active during the route
> >> loss? Most of the nodes seem to have direct connections and the "30
> >> seconds until recovery" sounds like an ETX value slowly going down and
> >> then dropping the link.
> >
> > 30 seconds is also something we see when our vpn connections break...
> >
> > --
> > Olsr-users mailing list
> > (spam-protected)
> > https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.olsr.org/pipermail/olsr-users/attachments/20140328/02e8cfbe/attachment.html>