[Olsr-users] Differences between actual OLSRD and RFC3626

[f campos]

Henning;
don´t get me wrong, i´m not talking baddly of olsr;
just asking usual questions;

cause theory is one thing, but really is another;
and to make the lnk state on 200 mhz cpu can be heavy;

but i will try to check the Dijkstra implementation;

i will be happy if it works good.


On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Henning Rogge <(spam-protected)>wrote:

> On Thursday 10 March 2011 19:44:59 f campos wrote:
> > Hi
> > there shall exist  some limitations:
> >
> > 1. in the code it shall be the maximum node;
> We use linked lists and AVL trees in the OLSR.org codebase. The maximum
> node
> number for our AVL trees would be ~2 billion, we use a signed integer to
> count
> the elements. ;)
>
> > 2. performance of link status transmission;
> Network performance... can be countered (partly) by using slower timings or
> more fish-eye...
>
> > 3. perfomance of calculation of Djikstra on a 200mhz cpu;
> Yeah... but Hannes Gredler wrote a very well behaving Dijkstra
> implementation,
> so thats not the limit at the moment.
>
> Henning Rogge
>
> --
> 1) You can't win.
> 2) You can't break even.
> 3) You can't leave the game.
> — The Laws of Thermodynamics, summarized
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.olsr.org/pipermail/olsr-users/attachments/20110311/c8e03748/attachment.html>