[Olsr-users] Differences between actual OLSRD and RFC3626
Fri Mar 11 20:35:40 CET 2011
don´t get me wrong, i´m not talking baddly of olsr;
just asking usual questions;
cause theory is one thing, but really is another;
and to make the lnk state on 200 mhz cpu can be heavy;
but i will try to check the Dijkstra implementation;
i will be happy if it works good.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Henning Rogge <(spam-protected)>wrote:
> On Thursday 10 March 2011 19:44:59 f campos wrote:
> > Hi
> > there shall exist some limitations:
> > 1. in the code it shall be the maximum node;
> We use linked lists and AVL trees in the OLSR.org codebase. The maximum
> number for our AVL trees would be ~2 billion, we use a signed integer to
> the elements. ;)
> > 2. performance of link status transmission;
> Network performance... can be countered (partly) by using slower timings or
> more fish-eye...
> > 3. perfomance of calculation of Djikstra on a 200mhz cpu;
> Yeah... but Hannes Gredler wrote a very well behaving Dijkstra
> so thats not the limit at the moment.
> Henning Rogge
> 1) You can't win.
> 2) You can't break even.
> 3) You can't leave the game.
> — The Laws of Thermodynamics, summarized
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Olsr-users