[OLSR-users] Re: Bridge removed, strange results?
Thu Jun 8 00:46:21 CEST 2006
Well, it's obviously passed my bedtime. The wlan interface was missing
the netmask, and XP's TCP stack apparently was still able to
communicate with it, while the others couldn't. All the boxes are up
now without bridging. I just need to use NAT or something to forward
packets to the LAN ports, or go with MID and run olsr on the wired
clients connected to the LAN port. Haven't decided which will be best
Hopefully, the performance from the LAN port will be as expected .
Will test tomorrow.
On 6/7/06, Joe Bush <(spam-protected)> wrote:
> As I mentioned earlier, I am running my OpenWrt boxes using bridging
> between the LAN and WLAN. This was giving extremely poor performance
> for (OLSR and non-OLSR) machines connected to the LAN port. I ended up
> removing the bridge, and the result wasn't as expected.
> Suddenly, the unbridged box could not see any of the other OLSR boxes
> and vice-versa. Yet my machine, wired to different OLSR box, could see
> the unbridged one once I started olsr. My machine was the only one in
> the unbridged box's MPR list. I could also see all the others.
> Is this strange? I think so, but there may be a logical explanation
> that I am hoping someone here will explain to me. ;)
More information about the Olsr-users