[OLSR-users] OLSR Camera

[Andreas Tønnesen]

he he.
Well - it's fixed and committed now. So no more -lm :)

- Andreas

Sven-Ola Tuecke wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> never mind - babies and bits have incompatible shift operators AFAIK.
> 
> LG, Sven-Ola
> 
> ""Andreas Tønnesen"" <(spam-protected)> schrieb im Newsbeitrag 
> news:(spam-protected)
> 
>>
>>
>>bah... what am I talking about... sorry for all this nonsene. This
>>is what happens when you get right out of bed at 14:30 and start
>>trying to think bits and bytes after a night of baby crying. I'll
>>fix this stuff and stop spamming the list ;)
>>
>>- andreas
>>
>>Andreas Tønnesen wrote:
>>
>>>Ups... I was a bit too fast on the trigger there :) It is of cause 2^n
>>>and not the other way around. So we ned a pow one way or the other.
>>>But perhaps I'll add a internal pow function.
>>>
>>>- Andreas
>>>
>>>Andreas Tønnesen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Sven-Ola Tuecke wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>- No function "real pow(real, real)". What's that stuff in mantissa.c!?
>>>>>  Replaced the pow(2,b) with (1 << b), seems to work OK.
>>>>>  Is it really necessary to fiddle with reals here?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>No, it's not nessecarry to use the pow(3) function here. The mantissa
>>>>stuff was a bit of trial and error(and some cut'n paste from here and
>>>>there I suspect) when I implemented it, and I used pow(3) for platform
>>>>indenpendency regarding endianness I guess. But it is not nesecarry and
>>>>bitshifting will do the job just fine. I'll clean it up(and probably get
>>>>rid of the math dependency in the process).
>>>>
>>>>- Andreas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>-- 
>>Andreas Tønnesen
>>http://www.olsr.org
>>_______________________________________________
>>olsr-users mailing list
>>(spam-protected)
>>https://www.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> olsr-users mailing list
> (spam-protected)
> https://www.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users

-- 
Andreas Tønnesen
http://www.olsr.org