[OLSR-users] OLSR Camera

Sven-Ola Tuecke (spam-protected)
Wed May 25 16:37:03 CEST 2005


Hey,

never mind - babies and bits have incompatible shift operators AFAIK.

LG, Sven-Ola

""Andreas Tønnesen"" <(spam-protected)> schrieb im Newsbeitrag 
news:(spam-protected)
>
>
>
> bah... what am I talking about... sorry for all this nonsene. This
> is what happens when you get right out of bed at 14:30 and start
> trying to think bits and bytes after a night of baby crying. I'll
> fix this stuff and stop spamming the list ;)
>
> - andreas
>
> Andreas Tønnesen wrote:
>>
>> Ups... I was a bit too fast on the trigger there :) It is of cause 2^n
>> and not the other way around. So we ned a pow one way or the other.
>> But perhaps I'll add a internal pow function.
>>
>> - Andreas
>>
>> Andreas Tønnesen wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sven-Ola Tuecke wrote:
>>>
>>>> - No function "real pow(real, real)". What's that stuff in mantissa.c!?
>>>>   Replaced the pow(2,b) with (1 << b), seems to work OK.
>>>>   Is it really necessary to fiddle with reals here?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> No, it's not nessecarry to use the pow(3) function here. The mantissa
>>> stuff was a bit of trial and error(and some cut'n paste from here and
>>> there I suspect) when I implemented it, and I used pow(3) for platform
>>> indenpendency regarding endianness I guess. But it is not nesecarry and
>>> bitshifting will do the job just fine. I'll clean it up(and probably get
>>> rid of the math dependency in the process).
>>>
>>> - Andreas
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> -- 
> Andreas Tønnesen
> http://www.olsr.org
> _______________________________________________
> olsr-users mailing list
> (spam-protected)
> https://www.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users 





More information about the Olsr-users mailing list