[OLSR-users] Redundant topology and MPR flooding simulations...

[lolo]

hi pedro

i'm aware of only one version of OLSR for NS that is declared rfc compliant
below is the announcement from the MANET mailling list.

as you know MPR redundancy and redundant topology are not mandatory
so you should contact the maintener of the NS code to check if they are
implemented.

hth
laurent

> A new OLSR implementation for NS2 developed at the University of 
> Murcia (Spain) is now available: 
> http://ants.dif.um.es/masimum/download.html
>
> It is highly compliant with RFC 3626 and supports NS 2.27 and 2.28 
> versions. It is released under the terms of the GNU General Public 
> License.
>
> You can see some documentation here: 
> http://ants.dif.um.es/masimum/um-olsr/html/index.html
>
> Best regards,
> Francisco J. Ros & Pedro M. Ruiz
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> (spam-protected)
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>

(spam-protected) wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I want to do some simulation work to measure the benefits (in terms of
>optimal path calculation), of using MPR redundancy and Redundant topology
>information... therefore, I wonder if anyone knows about an OLSR
>implemenation in any simulator (e.g. NS-2) that has these features
>implemented and that I could use... so, I could do some work playing with
>MPR_Coverage and TC_Redundancy parameters....
>
>
>
>cheers
>
>Pedro Villanueva
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>olsr-users mailing list
>(spam-protected)
>https://www.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users
>
>
>