[Olsr-dev] reduce OLSR bandwidth by tuning emission intervals

Saverio Proto (spam-protected)
Wed Feb 27 00:17:02 CET 2013


Teco our network architecture is described here:
http://blog.ninux.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/NinuxRoma-RoutingArchitecture-DocumentVersion0.pdf

do you have a similar document to read to understand the network
architecture you have in place ?

thanks

Saverio


2013/2/26 Henning Rogge <(spam-protected)>:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Teco Boot <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>>> Because many MANETs might have more than one VPN endpoint. Which makes
>>> it difficult for the backbone to decide which endpoint to use (same
>>> prefix for multiple endpoints).
>>
>> My described network design does't run routing on the tunnel. Each router sets up its own tunnel. So for example a MANET with 20 routers and 5 exit links has 20 tunnels. Average number of tunnel keep-alives on exit link is 4. For MANETs with few exit links, this models doesn't work well. But this becomes less common, I think.
>
> Not sure I get how this works.
>
>>> Thats just a matter of routing metric. If the VPN costs are low
>>> enough, they will be highly preferred.
>>
>> No, in the described model there is no routing on the tunnel.
>
> Okay, maybe "HNA with low metric". So that these "external prefixes
> behind the tunnel" have a well defined cost from the mesh point of
> view.
>
> Henning Rogge
> --
> We began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still. We have lingured
> long enough on the shores of the cosmic ocean. We are ready at last to
> set sail for the stars - Carl Sagan




More information about the Olsr-dev mailing list