[Olsr-dev] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Topology inconsistency?

[(spam-protected)]

Hi Aaron,

sorry for the following bad news :-(

My running OLSR version still is based on 0.5.5 (with a couple of changes
from 0.5.6rc7).
But the changed timing behaviour, floating point calculation, ETX... I
actually did not port. This would take me appr. 2 weeks.
I will do that later (these are the good news) but actually I have some
other work to do and I will then be on vacation 'til mid of august.
The BSD support is running fine on my target also.
We run the OLSR code on a PPC405 (PowerPC) target, so it is not very
helpful to give you a binary version of the vxworks port.
I could compile for i68 as well, but in this case you would need to run a
vxWorks simulator on your intel machine (which is licenced).

Yes, VxWorks support would be cool but I think (due to my vacation) you
should go on with the release process and I will do the 0.5.6 porting on
the stable version.

Sorry for the bad news...
Thomas

aaron <(spam-protected)> schrieb am 16.07.2008 15:42:03:

> Thomas, could you please check out the newest
> olsr version from http://gredler.at/hg/olsrd  (tip) and check
> if it works / runs/compiles under VxWorks
> OR maybe is there a version of VxWorks that I can run in kvm/qemu?
>
> I checked OpenBSD support now - seems to run fine.
> Can you maybe also give us a binary for VxWorks that we can put onto the
> homepage?
>
> We want to release 0.5.6 (-STABLE) soon and support for VxWorks would be
> very cool.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Aaron.
>
>
>
> (spam-protected) wrote:
>
>
> >
> > Hi Henning,
> >
> > I tested the changesets below and they work fine.
> > But for correct topology display olsrd_dot_draw.c should also consider
> > OLSR_TC_EDGE_DOWN flag
> > For that I pushed:
> > http://gredler.at/hg/olsrd/rev/09e7fc5e93c3
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> > Thomas Martin
> > Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co. KG
> > Postfach 801469, D-81614 München
> > Tel ++ 49 89 4129 15066
> > eMail: (spam-protected)
> >
> >
>
>