[Olsr-users] Olsr-users Digest, Vol 99, Issue 2

Ros Molodyko (spam-protected)
Fri Sep 4 18:40:22 CEST 2015 

I'm using OLSR (from 0.6.5.2 to 0.6.8) in CORE for few years and it runs fine.
The only issue with CORE is the broadcast address of the virtual node is not set in the virtual interface, 
so I set it manually in the OLSR configuration file:
InterfaceDefaults {
    Ip4Broadcast      255.255.255.255
}

The same setting is available for the command-line "-bcast" (I did not test it).
I did not test OLSR 1.x yet...
      From: "(spam-protected)" <(spam-protected)>
 To: (spam-protected) 
 Sent: Friday, September 4, 2015 6:00 AM
 Subject: Olsr-users Digest, Vol 99, Issue 2
   
Send Olsr-users mailing list submissions to
    (spam-protected)

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    (spam-protected)

You can reach the person managing the list at
    (spam-protected)

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Olsr-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. Olsr v1 0.9 in an emulated environment (O'Keeffe, Daniel)
  2. Re: Olsr v1 0.9 in an emulated environment (Henning Rogge)
  3. Re: Olsr v1 0.9 in an emulated environment (Henning Rogge)
  4. Re: Olsr v1 0.9 in an emulated environment (Dan O'Keeffe)
  5. Re: Olsr v1 0.9 in an emulated environment (Henning Rogge)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:31:09 +0000
From: "O'Keeffe, Daniel" <(spam-protected)>
To: "(spam-protected)" <(spam-protected)>
Subject: [Olsr-users] Olsr v1 0.9 in an emulated environment
Message-ID:
    <(spam-protected)>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hello,
Is there any reason why OLSRd v1 0.9 shouldn't work in an emulated environment (specifically the CORE/EMANE network emulator)? The reason I ask is that versions 0.6.x work fine for me, but when I try with 0.9 none of the nodes seem to connect to each other. I notice in the log output by 0.9 though that the virtual eth0 interface is flagged as not being a wireless interface, whereas there was no such message before. Is this a problem for the newer version?
Dan

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 19:27:52 +0200
From: Henning Rogge <(spam-protected)>
To: "O'Keeffe, Daniel" <(spam-protected)>
Cc: "(spam-protected)" <(spam-protected)>
Subject: Re: [Olsr-users] Olsr v1 0.9 in an emulated environment
Message-ID:
    <(spam-protected)>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi,

Okay, I just tested Core with both olsrd and olsrd2... I can verify
that the problem for olsrd exists...

my guess is that olsrd is missing the broadcast address (core set this
to 0.0.0.0).

Let me have a look into the code.

Henning



On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:31 PM, O'Keeffe, Daniel
<(spam-protected)> wrote:
> Hello,
> Is there any reason why OLSRd v1 0.9 shouldn't work in an emulated environment (specifically the CORE/EMANE network emulator)? The reason I ask is that versions 0.6.x work fine for me, but when I try with 0.9 none of the nodes seem to connect to each other. I notice in the log output by 0.9 though that the virtual eth0 interface is flagged as not being a wireless interface, whereas there was no such message before. Is this a problem for the newer version?
> Dan
> --
> Olsr-users mailing list
> (spam-protected)
> https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 19:47:41 +0200
From: Henning Rogge <(spam-protected)>
To: "O'Keeffe, Daniel" <(spam-protected)>
Cc: "(spam-protected)" <(spam-protected)>
Subject: Re: [Olsr-users] Olsr v1 0.9 in an emulated environment
Message-ID:
    <CAGnRvur5eSL3usOikcG0rbwP7bku_Ci5=B+ZOR9wma=(spam-protected)>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi,

should work with the most recent "master" commit... can you try?

Henning

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Henning Rogge <(spam-protected)> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Okay, I just tested Core with both olsrd and olsrd2... I can verify
> that the problem for olsrd exists...
>
> my guess is that olsrd is missing the broadcast address (core set this
> to 0.0.0.0).
>
> Let me have a look into the code.
>
> Henning
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:31 PM, O'Keeffe, Daniel
> <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Is there any reason why OLSRd v1 0.9 shouldn't work in an emulated environment (specifically the CORE/EMANE network emulator)? The reason I ask is that versions 0.6.x work fine for me, but when I try with 0.9 none of the nodes seem to connect to each other. I notice in the log output by 0.9 though that the virtual eth0 interface is flagged as not being a wireless interface, whereas there was no such message before. Is this a problem for the newer version?
>> Dan
>> --
>> Olsr-users mailing list
>> (spam-protected)
>> https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 21:41:07 +0100
From: Dan O'Keeffe <(spam-protected)>
To: Henning Rogge <(spam-protected)>
Cc: "(spam-protected)" <(spam-protected)>
Subject: Re: [Olsr-users] Olsr v1 0.9 in an emulated environment
Message-ID: <(spam-protected)>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Hey Henning,
Got a chance to try your patch this evening and it seems to do the
trick. Thanks a lot.
Dan

On 03/09/15 18:47, Henning Rogge wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> should work with the most recent "master" commit... can you try?
> 
> Henning
> 
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Henning Rogge <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Okay, I just tested Core with both olsrd and olsrd2... I can verify
>> that the problem for olsrd exists...
>>
>> my guess is that olsrd is missing the broadcast address (core set this
>> to 0.0.0.0).
>>
>> Let me have a look into the code.
>>
>> Henning
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:31 PM, O'Keeffe, Daniel
>> <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> Is there any reason why OLSRd v1 0.9 shouldn't work in an emulated environment (specifically the CORE/EMANE network emulator)? The reason I ask is that versions 0.6.x work fine for me, but when I try with 0.9 none of the nodes seem to connect to each other. I notice in the log output by 0.9 though that the virtual eth0 interface is flagged as not being a wireless interface, whereas there was no such message before. Is this a problem for the newer version?
>>> Dan
>>> --
>>> Olsr-users mailing list
>>> (spam-protected)
>>> https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users



------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 11:23:11 +0200
From: Henning Rogge <(spam-protected)>
To: Ferry Huberts <(spam-protected)>
Cc: "(spam-protected)" <(spam-protected)>
Subject: Re: [Olsr-users] Olsr v1 0.9 in an emulated environment
Message-ID:
    <CAGnRvupQ1-pk90XyhTn=FTV6Rtu0VME-rjAkO52B=(spam-protected)>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Ferry,

do you see an reason not to include the commit
5027f303b2dc60741cf442d2be4d21647705afb4 not into our stable releases?
http://olsr.org/git/?p=olsrd.git;a=commit;h=5027f303b2dc60741cf442d2be4d21647705afb4

Henning

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Dan O'Keeffe <(spam-protected)> wrote:
> Hey Henning,
> Got a chance to try your patch this evening and it seems to do the
> trick. Thanks a lot.
> Dan
>
> On 03/09/15 18:47, Henning Rogge wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> should work with the most recent "master" commit... can you try?
>>
>> Henning
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Henning Rogge <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Okay, I just tested Core with both olsrd and olsrd2... I can verify
>>> that the problem for olsrd exists...
>>>
>>> my guess is that olsrd is missing the broadcast address (core set this
>>> to 0.0.0.0).
>>>
>>> Let me have a look into the code.
>>>
>>> Henning
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:31 PM, O'Keeffe, Daniel
>>> <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> Is there any reason why OLSRd v1 0.9 shouldn't work in an emulated environment (specifically the CORE/EMANE network emulator)? The reason I ask is that versions 0.6.x work fine for me, but when I try with 0.9 none of the nodes seem to connect to each other. I notice in the log output by 0.9 though that the virtual eth0 interface is flagged as not being a wireless interface, whereas there was no such message before. Is this a problem for the newer version?
>>>> Dan
>>>> --
>>>> Olsr-users mailing list
>>>> (spam-protected)
>>>> https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users



------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

-- 
Olsr-users mailing list
(spam-protected)
https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users

------------------------------

End of Olsr-users Digest, Vol 99, Issue 2
*****************************************


  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.olsr.org/pipermail/olsr-users/attachments/20150904/d2f87022/attachment.html>

More information about the Olsr-users mailing list