[Olsr-users] OLSR routing issue with highly connected node
Mitar
(spam-protected)
Fri Dec 26 16:49:31 CET 2014
Hi!
I think you should leave MTU stuff as it is for v1, but detect MTU
issues in v2. Focus on v2. :-) v1 works good enough. :-)
Mitar
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Henning Rogge <(spam-protected)> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Jernej Kos <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> On 26. 12. 2014 15:16, Henning Rogge wrote:
>>> Which should only happen with some crazy bridged interface stuff...
>>> because OLSR packets are never forwarded on IP layer. I am not even
>>> sure how a "cannot fragment" problem between two bridged interfaces
>>> (which might have no IP address!) is handled.
>>
>> No, you may get reports via ICMP even when OLSR packets are not
>> forwarded. Note that there are two interfaces to any link and the MTU of
>> the sending interface may be different from the MTU of the receiving
>> interface -- which indicates an error condition in MTU settings.
>
> *sigh* someone should be hurt for preventing you from receiving data
> you already got...
>
> So what do you think about setting IP_MTU_DISCOVER to IP_PMTUDISC_DONT?
>
> I definitely will not integrate a full "test for lower MTU" scheme
> into the old olsrd code.
>
> Henning Rogge
>
> --
> Olsr-users mailing list
> (spam-protected)
> https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users
--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m
More information about the Olsr-users
mailing list