[Olsr-users] OLSR routing issue with highly connected node

[Henning Rogge]

Could we maybe get a txtinfo output from the VPN-nodes itself?

Otherwise we are missing a lot of link data.

Henning

On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Mitar <(spam-protected)> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just to be clear, in the above txtinfo Jernej attached, if I
> understand correctly, the test node was connected to the two VPN
> servers, 10.254.0.2 and 10.254.0.4. txtinfo shows that there was
> information only from 10.254.0.4, the one with less peers (78 at the
> moment). The really highly connected VPN server (10.254.0.2) with 160
> nodes at the moment is not to be seen at all. And all nodes connected
> to that 10.254.0.2 are not visible as well.
>
> So the questions are:
> - why there are not all routes to all nodes at least through 10.254.0.4
> - why routes through 10.254.0.4 appear and disappear and don't stay around
> - why routes though 10.254.0.2 are not there at all (at least a direct
> link to it should be there)
>
> Kostko, could you test what happens if the node has a VPN tunnel only
> to 10.254.0.4? Does it then have all routes?
>
>
> Mitar
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Henning Rogge <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Jernej Kos <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> Ok, so I reproduced the problem and fetched the txtinfo output
>>> (attached). Sometimes there are a couple of routes added into the tables
>>> (as Mitar reported), but they then get removed. Even when the routes are
>>> present, they are not for the part of the network behind the node with
>>> high neighbour count.
>>
>> So the "highly connected node" sometimes only detects a single link.. *hmm*
>>
>> I have to look into this, hopefully tomorrow.
>>
>> Henning
>>
>> --
>> Olsr-users mailing list
>> (spam-protected)
>> https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users
>
>
>
> --
> http://mitar.tnode.com/
> https://twitter.com/mitar_m