[Olsr-users] OLSR routing issue with highly connected node
Mitar
(spam-protected)
Mon Dec 22 12:43:07 CET 2014
Hi!
Just to be clear, in the above txtinfo Jernej attached, if I
understand correctly, the test node was connected to the two VPN
servers, 10.254.0.2 and 10.254.0.4. txtinfo shows that there was
information only from 10.254.0.4, the one with less peers (78 at the
moment). The really highly connected VPN server (10.254.0.2) with 160
nodes at the moment is not to be seen at all. And all nodes connected
to that 10.254.0.2 are not visible as well.
So the questions are:
- why there are not all routes to all nodes at least through 10.254.0.4
- why routes through 10.254.0.4 appear and disappear and don't stay around
- why routes though 10.254.0.2 are not there at all (at least a direct
link to it should be there)
Kostko, could you test what happens if the node has a VPN tunnel only
to 10.254.0.4? Does it then have all routes?
Mitar
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Henning Rogge <(spam-protected)> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Jernej Kos <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> Ok, so I reproduced the problem and fetched the txtinfo output
>> (attached). Sometimes there are a couple of routes added into the tables
>> (as Mitar reported), but they then get removed. Even when the routes are
>> present, they are not for the part of the network behind the node with
>> high neighbour count.
>
> So the "highly connected node" sometimes only detects a single link.. *hmm*
>
> I have to look into this, hopefully tomorrow.
>
> Henning
>
> --
> Olsr-users mailing list
> (spam-protected)
> https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users
--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m
More information about the Olsr-users
mailing list