[Olsr-users] Ad-hoc bridge Delay
Mehdi Bezahaf
(spam-protected)
Tue Nov 30 08:08:10 CET 2010
Hi there!
In fact you're right, I have observed the same problem using a linux bridge between two wireless interfaces (without olsr). The first interface was configured on adhoc mode and the second on ap mode. I thought that the problem was the linux bridge, so I've upgrade it (I've used the last version) ==> same problem.
I've implemented my own bridge using click modular router (at kernel mode) ==> same result.
Finally, I've used the same Linux bridge between two wired interface ==> the problem has disappeared!!!
Mehdi Bezahaf
Ph.D student at university Pierre et Marie curie (Paris).
On Nov 30, 2010, at 3:53 AM, Mitar <(spam-protected)> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Aaron Rosen <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>> Is there another way around this?
>
> What do you use for bridging? Is there any packet loss? (Check
> ifconfig counts for errors and other things and compare them in both
> modes of operation.)
>
> You do not need to run NAT even if you do not run bridging. Bridging
> works on layer 2. But you can still route (layer 3) traffic between
> interfaces without NAT. NAT does not have anything with this. NAT is
> only necessary if you have on one interface private IPs and on another
> public IPs.
>
>
> Mitar
>
> --
> Olsr-users mailing list
> (spam-protected)
> http://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.olsr.org/pipermail/olsr-users/attachments/20101130/e57d8708/attachment.html>
More information about the Olsr-users
mailing list