[Olsr-users] Current OLSR protocol
Fri May 22 21:37:56 CEST 2009
L. Aaron Kaplan wrote:
> Ulf, I do not agree with your assessment. The result of the FUD can be
> clearly seen by the uncertainty and doubt that people have been having
> repeatedly on this mailing list.
> So therefore I believe I can rest my case and the mail by Damian was
> the proof for my FUD theory.
> Besides, I do reserve the right to have my own experience and my
> opinion and do not tolerate others just calling my impression crap
> when they have no idea of *how* often I had to "defend" against the oh-
> therefore-the-rest-of-the-world-is-wrong-and-sucks attitude of some
> folks in Berlin. It is really tiresome to always have to "defend" a
> decision to still work on olsr.org in face of public *propaganda*.
Exactly. Spot on.
> I see it like that: there is room for improvement on olsr.org and
> there is a place for BATMAN.
> Different goals. That is all. But why oh why do all the people get
> confused when they read Elektra's text on open-mesh.org ? Why do I see
> the same and the same type of questions again and again?
> Exactly because it is propaganda.
> ok, over and out. I think I made my point clear.
> <joke>if you want we can carry this out in person with boxing gloves</
> joke> ;-))
> PS: again, in case it was not clear enough - congrats to successes of
> BATMAN . It is *not* the issue of which is better. It is an issue if
> Elektra pisses on other people constantly or not.
> But I guess I should get simply used to that... seems like she likes
> it. *sigh*
Unfortunately this does appear to be the case. :(
More information about the Olsr-users