[Olsr-users] 802.11S
Hannes Gredler
(spam-protected)
Fri May 23 18:01:16 CEST 2008
given the recent performance improvements of olsrd we can afford
high maintenance ;-)
Don Moskaluk wrote:
> What a great way to describe the situation. If Heide Klum is my girl
> friend then I know she is high maintenance and will need more resources
> that I currently have today. So it would be beneficial that I would
> need to expand my network to meet Heide's lifestyle. If not bye, bye,
> Heide hello mom and dad.
>
> Don Moskaluk
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannes Gredler [mailto:(spam-protected)]
> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 11:47 AM
> To: Don Moskaluk
> Cc: Aaron Kaplan; Juliusz Chroboczek; (spam-protected)
> Subject: Re: [Olsr-users] 802.11S
>
> none of the core developers is interested in writing a 802.11S stack
> into olsrd.
>
> once your girlfriend is "heidi klum" you don't move back to
> your parents, right ;-)
>
> /hannes
>
> Don Moskaluk wrote:
>> I understand the idea of building towards something that is not
> finished
>> however I do understand the most existing mesh solutions will need
>> either to bridge or connect with 802.11S. My understand is that OLSR
>> will bridge and not fully integrate 802.11S. I also understand in
>> Hybrid mode that nobody has implemented however that may changed with
> a
>> host of new products being design for the future. What will be the
> road
>> map for OLSR and 802.11S? Is somebody looking at this in future or
> are
>> people working on it today?
>>
>> Don Moskaluk
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: (spam-protected)
>> [mailto:(spam-protected)] On Behalf Of Aaron Kaplan
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 12:21 PM
>> To: Juliusz Chroboczek
>> Cc: (spam-protected)
>> Subject: Re: [Olsr-users] 802.11S
>>
>>
>> On May 20, 2008, at 6:12 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>>
>>>> No, they cannot be compatible (one mode of 802.11s is inspired by
>>>> olsr, but it's difficult to say as long as we have no final
>>>> RFC/Release.
>>> Note by the way that the RA-OLSR mode is optional, and I don't think
>>> anyone is planning to implement it. (The compulsory mode is a hybrid
>> yes, nobody did so far.
>>
>> a.
>>
>>
>
More information about the Olsr-users
mailing list