[OLSR-users] Bug/feature?: hosts of the same LAN in the routing table

[Jens Nachtigall]

> > #1 is on LAN #5
> > #2 and #3 are on LAN #6
> >
> > Is there any need to include host addresses #1, #2 and #3 in the
> > routing table, since they are directly reachable through the LAN?
>
> yes this is how mesh routing works.

Yes, sure. The thing is that the mentioned host addresses are just one 
hop away, from my point of view olsrd could notice that they are 
somewhat redundant, since there is already one sufficient entry (the 
one for the lan) within the routing table. Hence, the routing table 
would be smaller. Or what is wrong with that perspektive?

Jens