[Olsr-dev] [PATCH v1 0/9] Also consider link state

[Bastian Bittorf]

* Henning Rogge <(spam-protected)> [11.02.2016 14:33]:
> > up  : state != DOWN &&  IFF_UP
> > down: state == DOWN || !IFF_UP  (same as !up)
> >
> > note what happens when state == UNKNOWN: fallback to what we have now
> 
> I am not sure we even get an "undefined" state on these routers... as
> far as I understand Bastian we get a WRONG state.

no, the assumption that state != DOWN && IFF_UP
seems OK to me. the only problem i see for switches is
that DOWN is never reached (but this is ok for OLSR)

bye, bastian