[Olsr-dev] Improving SPF with binary heaps

[Henning Rogge]

We had a fix for olsrd some time ago which was important for Core...

because Core forgets to set a good broadcast address.

Merge the latest olsr master branch into your binary heap branch and try again.

Henning

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Diogo Gonçalves
<(spam-protected)> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for my long time offline, I had some problems at home that disturbed
> me.
>
> I finish my new patch [1] following the plain, if i did something wrong
> about the plain, tell me and i'll fix it.
>
> Henning suggested me to use CORE to test my code, I installed the emulator
> but I haven't found a way to configure CORE to run my olsrd. Is there a
> reference to learn more about olsrd on CORE?
>
> Again, sorry for my time out. I'm available to work on this project and I
> want to do this.
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/diogomg/olsrd-binary-heap
>
> 2015-08-21 1:40 GMT-03:00 Henning Rogge <(spam-protected)>:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Diogo Gonçalves
>> <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm finishing my patch, I'll send it to you soon.
>>>
>>> For now, I just have some issues about how to measure the performance of
>>> the priority queues in olsrd. I'm using olsr switch to test my code and I
>>> did not find a good way to scale my network and measure the performance. I
>>> have some results outside the olsrd(see attachments) using kcachegrind and
>>> other tools to do this and now I'm trying to measure the performance into
>>> the olsrd too.
>>>
>>> Is olsr switch the best way to do this?
>>
>>
>> No, it is definitely not.
>>
>> I would go with an emulator like CORE (from the NRL) or maybe setup a
>> bunch of VMs on my own.
>>
>> Henning
>>
>