[Olsr-dev] OLSRv2 release version 0.3.0

Syed Salman Haider Rizvi (spam-protected)
Tue Sep 24 10:04:37 CEST 2013


Hi Tecco,
             I had sent all the configurations in the previous mails which were fine . I think there is some problem in the daemon due to which i m not able to communicate .
Thanks
Salman

> Subject: Re: [Olsr-dev] OLSRv2 release version 0.3.0
> From: (spam-protected)
> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 21:19:54 +0200
> CC: (spam-protected); (spam-protected)
> 
> References: <(spam-protected)>, <(spam-protected)>, <(spam-protected)>, <(spam-protected)>, <(spam-protected)>, <(spam-protected)>, <(spam-protected)>, <(spam-protected)>, <(spam-protected) e>,<(spam-protected)> <(spam-protected)>, <(spam-protected)> <(spam-protected)>, <(spam-protected)> <(spam-protected)>, <(spam-protected)> <(spam-protected)>, <(spam-protected)> <(spam-protected)>, <(spam-protected)> <(spam-protected)>, <(spam-protected)> <(spam-protected)>, <(spam-protected)> <(spam-protected)>
> To: Syed Salman Haider Rizvi <(spam-protected)>
> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
> 
> Try to follow…
> 
> If you tcpdump and don't catch ARP requests, it is sub-IP.
> Do you have arp entries?
> Please send info from both nodes, iw/iwconfig and ifconfig.
> And arp -an and tcpdump during ping.
> If ARP is OK and no firewall, IP should run.
> 
> Teco
> 
> 
> Op 23 sep. 2013, om 16:10 heeft Syed Salman Haider Rizvi <(spam-protected)> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> > 
> > Well i run the tcpdump on both routers (wlan0) and output is shown below on one of the router and ip for both wlan0 are different 
> > 
> > 
> > Also  pinging is not working on any of the router . Also want to i ask i m running on backfire on my router will changing to backfire to attitute adjustment (on which i compiled) make any difference ?
> > 
> > Thanks 
> > 
> > (spam-protected):~# tcpdump -i wlan0 -vv
> > 
> > tcpdump: listening on wlan0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes
> > 00:02:44.426806 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 1, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 70)
> >     10.0.1.8.269 > 224.0.0.109.269: [udp sum ok] UDP, length 42
> > 00:02:46.526935 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 1, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 70)
> >     10.0.1.8.269 > 224.0.0.109.269: [udp sum ok] UDP, length 42
> > 00:02:48.627019 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 1, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 70)
> >     10.0.1.8.269 > 224.0.0.109.269: [udp sum ok] UDP, length 42
> > 00:02:50.727818 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 1, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 70)
> >     10.0.1.8.269 > 224.0.0.109.269: [udp sum ok] UDP, length 42
> > 
> > > I assume you have configured the new IP addresses (different ones) on
> > > both wlan0 interfaces.
> > > 
> > > one of them (according to an earlier mail) was 10.0.1.9/24.
> > > 
> > > What is the output of the ping on the other side? Maybe tcpdump running
> > > on both sides could help you to debug the problem.
> > 
> >  
> > -- 
> > Olsr-dev mailing list
> > (spam-protected)
> > https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-dev
> 
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.olsr.org/pipermail/olsr-dev/attachments/20130924/c7e5ef1c/attachment.html>


More information about the Olsr-dev mailing list