[Olsr-dev] olsr strange behaving / nearly no outgoing packets / patched olsrd

Henning Rogge (spam-protected)
Fri Jun 29 16:18:12 CEST 2012


We just have to look into if OpenWRT can use branches or tags as
download targets.

Henning

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Ferry Huberts <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>
>
> On 29-06-12 15:55, Ferry Huberts wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 29-06-12 13:58, Henning Rogge wrote:
>>>
>>> Lets continue this discussion we started last week...
>>>
>>
>> Ok.
>> Hold on...
>>
>> Let's 'kill' the master branch as it is now.
>> It's been 'dead' for a long time.
>>
>> Best way to do this it to rename it to something like 'experimental' (I
>> don't know a good name, so if someone comes up with one...)
>>
>> Then we rename stable to master.
>>
>> Under git conventions:
>> - master is used to work towards the next release
>> - releases are tagged
>> - branches are to be used for features of which it has not been decided
>> that they need to be in the next release, or for features that take more
>> time or pose a risk to destabalising or delaying the next release
>>
>>
>>> Fact 1: we need a "more stable" stable branch.
>
>
>
> this is normally solved by branching from released versions and
> cherry-picking fixes on those maintenance branches. we can do something like
> that as well, but it's more overhead since we'd then have to maintain a few
> releases at the same time.
>
> for example:
> - we tag 0.7
> - we branch v0.7 from 0.7
> - we continue work on master, toward 0.8
> - we cherry-pick fixes from master onto v0.7
> - we can release 0.7.x from the v0.7 branch, and tag these releases
> - ad nauseum
>
>
>>
>> why?
>> tags are to point at stable points.
>>
>> we should release more often
>>
>>> Fact 2: we need a place where it is easy for people to commit new stuff.
>>
>>
>> that would be on the master branch
>>
>> or on feature branches
>>
>>> Fact 3: the development branch is dead (only useful for archive purpose).
>>
>>
>> that would be the current stable / new master
>>
>>>
>>> Any disagreement with this three "facts" ?
>>>
>>
>> yes, see above ;-)
>>
>>> Henning Rogge
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:39 PM, ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto)
>>> <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Because the stable branch could not be really stable, and it changes
>>>> too often
>>>>
>>>> Saverio
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2012/6/29 Bastian Bittorf <(spam-protected)>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) we can release a 0.6.3.1 that applies the patch from JoW (sorry
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> cannot provide a link to git because olsr.org is down at the
>>>>>> moment)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2) We can create a openwrt branch that is a fork of latest release
>>>>>> tag
>>>>>> + cherry picks patches
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> why not simply change the openwrt-makefile to
>>>>> make a git-checkout?
>>>>>
>>>>> bye, Bastian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Olsr-dev mailing list
>>>> (spam-protected)
>>>> https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Ferry Huberts
>
>



-- 
Steven Hawkings about cosmic inflation: "An increase of billions of
billions of percent in a tiny fraction of a second. Of course, that
was before the present government."




More information about the Olsr-dev mailing list