[Olsr-dev] olsrd debian update

[Teco Boot]

Can't we use /etc/init.d/olsrd script and /etc/default/olsrd to solve this?
Until olsrv2, we can have a non-default config_file option, pointing to /etc/olsrd/olsrd.conf.

Teco


Op 6 jun. 2012, om 18:02 heeft Hans-Christoph Steiner het volgende geschreven:

> 
> /etc/olsrd is already in the official Debian package and it working fine.
> 
> I think either olsrd should adopt /etc/olsrd as its conf directory, or
> this should be handled in the packaging with a patch.  I think it does
> not make sense to maintain Debian-specific customizations in olsrd, i.e.
> supporting different conf directories.  The build system is a bit scary
> and contentious, so I think that the patch in Debian is much less work.
> 
> .hc
> 
> On 06/06/2012 11:52 AM, Henning Rogge wrote:
>> Hmm...
>> 
>> okay, we have to think about how to deal with this. Because just
>> moving the default configuration file might break a lot of things.
>> 
>> Maybe looking if the olsrd subdirectory exists might be a good switch
>> to decide where the default file should be.
>> 
>> Henning
>> 
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner
>> <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Some plugins use files, like secure's keyfile, jsoninfo's uuidfile, etc.
>>> Therefore there is no guarantee to have one conf file for olsrd.
>>> 
>>> .hc
>>> 
>>> On 06/06/2012 11:10 AM, Henning Rogge wrote:
>>>> Is there a reason why the olsrd config file again moved into /etc/olsrd/ ?
>>>> 
>>>> Last thing I heard was that only packages with multiple config files
>>>> need a subdirectory in Debian.
>>>> 
>>>> Patch 100 is not really useful, if you fork into background you don't
>>>> get any output anyways.
>>>> Patch 110... hmm.
>>>> Patch 111 should be integrated into our repository.
>>>> Patch 260 too.
>>>> Patch 270 too, but I am not sure the GTK gui works with ETX anyways. ^^
>>>> Patch 280 could be integrated too.
>>>> 
>>>> Henning
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Roland Stigge <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 06/06/2012 04:12 PM, Henning Rogge wrote:
>>>>>> @Roland: if there are more "debian patches", I would like to talk with
>>>>>> you about integrating them into the main branch, so we don't need them
>>>>>> anymore in Debian.
>>>>> 
>>>>> At
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://patch-tracker.debian.org/package/olsrd/
>>>>> 
>>>>> you can find the patches that Debian is shipping with olsrd (currently
>>>>> 0.6.2-2). Well possible that they can be integrated if they are not
>>>>> forwarded already. Also, maybe some are obsolete already? You should be
>>>>> able to find the reasons behind the patches in the Debian changelog.
>>>>> Feel free to ask, otherwise.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm also interested in keeping this Debian patchset as small as possible.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Roland
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Olsr-dev mailing list
> (spam-protected)
> https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-dev