[Olsr-dev] obsolete branches

Ferry Huberts (spam-protected)
Wed Mar 2 13:28:51 CET 2011


On 03/02/2011 12:54 PM, Markus Kittenberger wrote:
>     This also seems to suggest that the 'incremental' branch could be
>     deleted?
> 
> why?
> 

well, logic seems to tell me that incremental comes before incremental2
and incremental2 was merged into stable, so that would make incremental
obsolete.

> defintely not,..
> 

my logic appears to be flawed :-)



-- 
Ferry Huberts




More information about the Olsr-dev mailing list