[Olsr-dev] obsolete branches
Ferry Huberts
(spam-protected)
Wed Mar 2 13:28:51 CET 2011
On 03/02/2011 12:54 PM, Markus Kittenberger wrote:
> This also seems to suggest that the 'incremental' branch could be
> deleted?
>
> why?
>
well, logic seems to tell me that incremental comes before incremental2
and incremental2 was merged into stable, so that would make incremental
obsolete.
> defintely not,..
>
my logic appears to be flawed :-)
--
Ferry Huberts
More information about the Olsr-dev
mailing list