[Olsr-dev] [PATCH 2/4] smart gateway: do not stop choosing a new (better) gateway
Thu Dec 8 14:39:42 CET 2011
On 12/08/2011 02:23 PM, Henning Rogge wrote:
> I agree to Teco, a solution with a hysteresis based on the distance to
> the gateway would be a much superior solution compared to the current one.
> A solution that keeps multiple tunnels up would be even better, but
> would need some kind of connection tracking. This could become very
> complicated, unless we switch to IPv6 and reconfigure the client address
> each time we switch the gateway.
So I think we then agree that a solution with hysteresis is acceptable?
Then as a first step, is merging the patch as it is now also acceptable?
And who is going to add the hysteresis?
More information about the Olsr-dev