[Olsr-dev] [PATCH 2/4] smart gateway: do not stop choosing a new (better) gateway

Ferry Huberts (spam-protected)
Thu Dec 8 14:39:42 CET 2011

On 12/08/2011 02:23 PM, Henning Rogge wrote:
> I agree to Teco, a solution with a hysteresis based on the distance to
> the gateway would be a much superior solution compared to the current one.
> A solution that keeps multiple tunnels up would be even better, but
> would need some kind of connection tracking. This could become very
> complicated, unless we switch to IPv6 and reconfigure the client address
> each time we switch the gateway.

So I think we then agree that a solution with hysteresis is acceptable?

Then as a first step, is merging the patch as it is now also acceptable?

And who is going to add the hysteresis?
Ferry Huberts

More information about the Olsr-dev mailing list