[Olsr-dev] I had a persistent loop in laboratory network

L. Aaron Kaplan (spam-protected)
Wed Oct 20 12:32:43 CEST 2010

Would it make sense to have some sort of checksum between topologies (and just exchange the checksum)?
(note the checksum should probably not include the LQ/NLQ values)

This would be - maybe - a first step towards some CSN style algorithm for topology table consistency checking.

On Oct 20, 2010, at 11:56 AM, ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto) wrote:

>> check with txtinfo, if they have wrong/different topology
>> if yes: find out why the have wrong topology
>> if no: find out why they have wrong routes with correct topology
> good point, if I make it to reproduce the bug, I'll make both routers
> print out the topology to check if both nodes see the same topology.
> btw the topology attached was printed by
> I'll keep you posted if I have news, Thanks !
> Saverio
> -- 
> Olsr-dev mailing list
> (spam-protected)
> http://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-dev

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.olsr.org/pipermail/olsr-dev/attachments/20101020/3f087344/attachment.sig>

More information about the Olsr-dev mailing list