[Olsr-dev] Ignoring signals

[Markus Kittenberger]

pong

from my point of view, if you would make a patch i would have no real
problem with it *G

BUT i have some doubts if 2 signals are really useable for all the various
plugins,..
what happens if 2 plugins want to use the same signal?

i think any plugin that needs user interaction should do this differently
than with SIGUSRx

regards Markus

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Mitar <(spam-protected)> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> Ping?
>
>
> Mitar
>
> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Mitar <(spam-protected)> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Could you add SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 to signal-handlers block with ignore
> > action (default is program termination) so that plugins could use
> > those signals but if OLSR instance does not have given plugin enabled
> > sending those signal would not terminate OLSR?
> >
> > signal(SIGUSR1, SIG_IGN);
> > signal(SIGUSR2, SIG_IGN);
> >
> >
> > Mitar
> >
>
> --
> Olsr-dev mailing list
> (spam-protected)
> http://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.olsr.org/pipermail/olsr-dev/attachments/20100410/c43d22ad/attachment.html>