[Olsr-dev] default config is rfc

[Aaron Kaplan]

On Oct 18, 2007, at 11:49 AM, Sven-Ola Tuecke wrote:

> Hi,
>
> the problem is: Who is Joe Average? The mentioned config is fine  
> for bigger
> meshes > 100 nodes and optimized for stationary nodes. But not  
> optional for
> a landscape site with 3-5 nodes moving around fast. The chance to  
> disturb
> others (e.g. by generating an LQ_TC storm) in a bigger mesh very  
> high -
> whereas running relatively slow routing-reactions in a small mesh  
> should not
> disturb anyone.
>

we once mentioned that a "mobility" parameter could control all the  
other params



> // Sven-Ola
>
> "John Hay" <(spam-protected)> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:(spam-protected)
>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 11:12:02AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wednesday 17 October 2007 14:13, Jens Nachtigall wrote:
>>>>> distro makes/packagers to what to deliver per default
>>>>> (or none at all to force people to think about it).
>>>
>>> Generally speaking and IMO: If it's possible to deliver a default  
>>> config
>>> which
>>> works for, say, >80% of the users (maybe even with small  
>>> tradeoffs, maybe
>>> even for 50% and not 80), I think it's sensible to ship one. Why  
>>> make
>>> life
>>> hard if it can be easy? :)
>>
>> I agree with this. If we really cannot have a .conf that works  
>> reasonably
>> ok for most (80%) of the users, we should rethink things. If it  
>> needs to
>> be tweaked differently for every network, surely we are missing  
>> something?
>>
>> John
>> -- 
>> John Hay -- (spam-protected) / (spam-protected)
>>
>> -- 
>> Olsr-dev mailing list
>> (spam-protected)
>> http://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-dev
>
>
> -- 
> Olsr-dev mailing list
> (spam-protected)
> http://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-dev
>

---
there's no place like 127.0.0.1