[Olsr-dev] Seeking comments: OLSR+ETX v/s DSR+ETX

[Hannes Gredler]

> on the other side do we all agree that current implementation of ETX is
> not the optimum.

thats correct, ETX is ok ETX and ETT would be nice to have.

> Even if ETT is the next step (i hope so and i look forward to it),

yes thats the plan, note that we have also other issues to fix like
- working on routing-loop sync issues
- add a generic OLSRv2 parser / msg generator

(read: a pile of work needs to be done) before we can implement ETT.

/hannes