[olsr-dev] LQ code enhancements
onelektra
(spam-protected)
Wed Mar 2 15:25:46 CET 2005
hello!
> i think there is nothing wrong with calculating the LQ from bigger/combined
> packets - quite in contrary i think this is a good idea.
I dont oppose to send bigger packets to measure LQ - that is a really
good idea.
Of course, having bigger packets show you a loss that is similar to the
loss of the payload. We were thinking about bigger hello's of a fixed
size by filling them up to a certain size in the first place.
So that approach is good - you avoid emitting unnecessary traffic to
create bigger packets if you squeeze other data into it that you have to
transmit anyway.
But I d suggest not to try calculating/weighting loss against paketsize.
You may want to do that if you want to find the best packetsize that
gives you the highest throughput, like TCP does.
I d suggest to measure the loss of packets that have always the *same*
packetsize, to stay with the KISS approach.
cu elektra
More information about the Olsr-dev
mailing list