[Olsr-users] olsrd2 with vmware,

Henning Rogge (spam-protected)
Thu Mar 12 10:30:54 CET 2015


Hi,

I finally managed to spend a bit more time with this bug and was able
to find and fix it with the data you provided.

The most recent commit should fix the behavior of the link_config plugin.

Henning

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Taner Kurtulus <(spam-protected)> wrote:
> Hi Henning,
>
> You can find the outputs of each systems as attached.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Henning Rogge <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Taner Kurtulus <(spam-protected)>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Henning,
>> >
>> > You are right about http plugin, i wasn't statically linked in to the
>> > olsrd2_static. I haven't seen it with --version parameter. Also
>> > actually, I
>> > assumed that all plugins would be statically linked into the
>> > olsrd2_static
>> > executable. Any way, I have used telnet interface as you advised.
>> >
>> > I figured out that my configuration parameters about bitrates are not
>> > getting into account. I couldn't understand why.
>> >
>> > Also I figured out that ff_dat_metric is being calculated on the fly
>> > according to the link speed. if there is only one interface there is no
>> > problem, it calculates correctly. But, when I use two interfaces it
>> > cannot
>> > calculate each link properly. I think this is my problem, and explains
>> > why
>> > my scenario is not working.
>> >
>> > Could you check it, if there is really a problem or it is from my
>> > configuration.
>> >
>> > I checked the interfaces, speeds and connections again and again. They
>> > are
>> > same with the scenario, I have sent before.
>>
>> Can you use the telnet port (most likely bound to 127.0.0.1:2009) to
>> get the output of the following commands on each of the three nodes?
>>
>> echo /nhdpinfo link | nc 127.0.0.1 2009
>>
>> Oh, and please no more screenshots... just append textfiles to the
>> mail if you want to send the results. Some of your mails are being
>> dropped by the list because they are more than 1 MB large.
>>
>> Henning Rogge
>
>




More information about the Olsr-users mailing list