[Olsr-users] Received message to big to be forwarded
Jernej Kos
(spam-protected)
Thu Apr 30 10:44:26 CEST 2015
Hello!
Sorry for taking so long, there were some other issues which prevented
the tests. I've tested this again today on the nodes with most links and
it seems that the patch does fix the issue.
I will push the patch to our OpenWrt feeds so that we can test it more.
Jernej
On 28. 04. 2015 09:26, Henning Rogge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> any news about the test?
>
> Henning
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Jernej Kos <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> Ok, great, I will test it out. Thanks!
>>
>>
>> Jernej
>>
>> On 17. 04. 2015 19:32, Henning Rogge wrote:
>>> Yes,
>>>
>>> start with the "lots of neighbors" nodes... this should already
>>> resolve the problem. if it works (and if we cannot find a problem with
>>> it) we will commit it and it will be part of the next olsrd bugfix
>>> release.
>>>
>>> Henning
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Jernej Kos <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>>>> Hello!
>>>>
>>>> So it will not help at all if we deploy it only at nodes producing big
>>>> announces? Then this will not help much as we can't just upgrade all the
>>>> ~400 nodes at the moment.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jernej
>>>>
>>>> On 17. 04. 2015 19:26, Henning Rogge wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> you should deploy this patch on ALL nodes... it should work against
>>>>> the current "master branch"... but also against your source.
>>>>>
>>>>> Henning
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Jernej Kos <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So if I understand this code correctly, this will limit the maximum
>>>>>> message size that an originator node will produce? So I should apply
>>>>>> this patch at the nodes with high neighbour count?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Against which revision is this? I will test the patch over the weekend
>>>>>> and report back.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jernej
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 17. 04. 2015 16:41, Henning Rogge wrote:
>>>>>>> Jernej,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> can you test the following patch?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/src/net_olsr.c b/src/net_olsr.c
>>>>>>> index afd24ec..4db54b1 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/src/net_olsr.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/src/net_olsr.c
>>>>>>> @@ -258,7 +258,14 @@ net_outbuffer_push_reserved(struct interface_olsr
>>>>>>> *ifp, const void *data, const
>>>>>>> int
>>>>>>> net_outbuffer_bytes_left(const struct interface_olsr *ifp)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> - return ifp->netbuf.maxsize - ifp->netbuf.pending;
>>>>>>> + /* IPv6 minimum MTU - IPv6 header - UDP header - VLAN-Tag */
>>>>>>> + static int MAX_REMAINING = 1280 - 40 - 8 - 4;
>>>>>>> + int remaining = ifp->netbuf.maxsize - ifp->netbuf.pending;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + if (remaining > MAX_REMAINING) {
>>>>>>> + return MAX_REMAINING;
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> + return remaining;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Henning
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.olsr.org/pipermail/olsr-users/attachments/20150430/54f83332/attachment.sig>
More information about the Olsr-users
mailing list