[Olsr-users] Routing-Problem | olsr.org - 0.6.0 | weight | etx_ff | mode ether
Michael Rack
(spam-protected)
Thu Mar 29 18:46:49 CEST 2012
Ok, but how can i tell olsr to prioritize routing on "vlan4" and only
take "wan" in case "vlan4" is not available?
Liebe Grüße aus Freilassing,
Michael Rack
RSM Freilassing
--
RSM Freilassing Tel.: +49 8654 607110
Nocksteinstr. 13 Fax.: +49 8654 670438
D-83395 Freilassing www.rsm-freilassing.de
Am 29.03.2012 17:15, schrieb Markus Kittenberger:
> i guess the weight does/did only with hopcount metric,..
>
> Markus
>
> p.s. true 0.5.5 is a previous version, but this was very very very
> long ago. (-;
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Michael Rack
> <(spam-protected)
> <mailto:(spam-protected)>> wrote:
>
> Dear olsr-users!
>
> I have a bad behavior and hope to get some help.
>
> I run only P2P Links (AP & STA) via wireless-lan and direct
> ethernet connections. Every node runs currently olsr version 0.6.0.
>
> The Problem:
> I have several upstreams and like to define which upstrem to be
> used via the weight parameter. In previous versions of olsr this
> worked fine (as i can remember v0.5.5). Now it dosn't.
>
> My Settings:
>
> Willingness 3
> LinkQualityLevel 2
> LinkQualityAlgorithm "etx_ff"
> UseHysteresis no
> TcRedundancy 2
> MprCoverage 1
>
> InterfaceDefaults
> {
> Ip4Broadcast 255.255.255.2555
> HelloInterval 2.0
> HelloValidityTime 60.0
> TcInterval 5.0
> TcValidityTime 120.0
> MidInterval 5.0
> MidValidityTime 120.0
> HnaInterval 5.0
> HnaValidityTime 120.0
> }
>
> Interface "wan"
> {
> Mode "ether"
> Weight 10
> }
>
> Interface "vlan2"
> {
> Mode "ether"
> Weight 2
> }
>
> Interface "vlan4"
> {
> Mode "ether"
> Weight 5
> }
>
>
> But currently the wan-interface is selected. While everything goes
> via "wan" the routing change to "vlan4" but after a few minutes
> the routing switch back to "wan" and i get a bad packet-loss for 4
> seconds while the routing is switching back to "wan" - but i don't
> know why because both links are up and running. I don't know where
> the packets get loosed.
>
> Currently Network-Design:
>
> INTERNET-ROUTER
> |
> / ------- / \ ------- \
> ROUTER A.1 ROUTER B.1
> | |
> ROUTER A.2 ROUTER B.2
> | |
> ROUTER A.3 |
> | |
> \ --------\ / ------- /
> "vlan4" | "wan"
> ROUTER C
> |
> ROUTER D
> |
> CLIENT
>
>
>
> MTR is done via ROUTER D and the internet. The routing decision is
> made on Router C that is multihomed (A.3 & B.2).
>
> So what have i to do, to make WEIGHT working?
>
> Liebe Grüße aus Freilassing,
>
> Michael Rack
> RSM Freilassing
> --
> RSM Freilassing Tel.: +49 8654 607110
> <tel:%2B49%208654%20607110>
> Nocksteinstr. 13 Fax.: +49 8654 670438
> <tel:%2B49%208654%20670438>
> D-83395 Freilassing www.rsm-freilassing.de
> <http://www.rsm-freilassing.de>
>
>
> --
> Olsr-users mailing list
> (spam-protected) <mailto:(spam-protected)>
> https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.olsr.org/pipermail/olsr-users/attachments/20120329/ea2110b7/attachment.html>
More information about the Olsr-users
mailing list