[Olsr-users] Fwd: Question about hidden node behavior

[Markus Kittenberger]

On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Teco Boot <(spam-protected)> wrote:

> 802.11e provides QoS support for apps that cannot tolerate jitter.

sure, but this should not "kill" other QoS scenarious,..

especially ones that work on other hardware and even other drivers for the
same hardware,.. *G

as afaik ath5k/ath9k provide backpressure and 802.11e aswell.

This
> works nice for for example a scenario where nodes A and C has a bulk flow,
> that has negative influence on real time flow between B and D, on same
> channel.
> Packet scheduling at higher layers cannot provide such class of QoS
> function,
>
provided a small queue, higher layers wouldn't perform "significantly"
worse,..

but ACK having a QoS aware harware & driver is defintely good!
(but it should extend overall QoS possibilities, and not limit them,..)

Markus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.olsr.org/pipermail/olsr-users/attachments/20110118/ff18af39/attachment.html>