[Olsr-users] HNA announce for the same network

Mitar (spam-protected)
Thu May 20 22:16:42 CEST 2010


Hi!

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Henning Rogge
<(spam-protected)> wrote:
> If you don't use NAT on the two nodes and the target network has a correct
> route back towards the OLSR nodes, it should work. TCP might be a little bit
> "annoyed" when the route changes because delay and packet ordering might be
> changed, but the connectivity should be there.

But is that really useful? Having a HNA on nodes connected to the
subnet means that you are not running OLSR in the subnet. So then you
probably have a static route just to one of this nodes connected to
the subnet (acting as a gateway). So if this nodes fails then having
another node does not really help.

It would help for load-balancing but then if one node fails you would
have just 50 % packet loss (if you have two nodes connected to the
subnet).

Or am I missing something? Any other use case?


Mitar




More information about the Olsr-users mailing list