[Olsr-users] olsrd bandwidth vs static routes

[Henning Rogge]

On Thu November 26 2009 04:18:52 Joseph Chop wrote:
> I have two N800s configured for an ad-hoc network.  One address is
> 192.168.0.1 and the other address is 192.168.0.2.  In the case of static
> routes, I simply enter the command on host 192.168.0.1:
> 
> ip route add 192.168.0.2 dev wlan0
> 
> similarily I enter the following command 192.168.0.2:
> 
> ip route add 192.168.0.1 dev wlan0
> 
> I transfer using iperf by typing
> iperf -s on one host and
> iperf --t 60 -c 192.168.0.1 on the other host
> 
> The nodes are about two feet from each other.  I've repeated the tests
> several times, and even tested using ttcp and nuttcp to confirm the
>  results.
I am sure olsrd is not able to increase your bandwith. In an indoor setup 
there are lot's of strange things which can change the parameters of your 
setup. The only thing OLSRd is doing is setting routes.

Henning Rogge

-- 
Diplom-Informatiker Henning Rogge , Fraunhofer-Institut für
Kommunikation, Informationsverarbeitung und Ergonomie FKIE
Kommunikationssysteme (KOM)
Neuenahrer Straße 20, 53343 Wachtberg, Germany
Telefon +49 228 9435-263,   Fax +49 228 9435 685
mailto:(spam-protected) http://www.fkie.fraunhofer.de
GPG: E1C6 0914 490B 3909 D944 F80D 4487 C67C 55EC CFE0
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.olsr.org/pipermail/olsr-users/attachments/20091126/bf8d0907/attachment.sig>