[Olsr-users] Sticky gateway
Alexander Morlang
(spam-protected)
Sun Jan 25 19:49:30 CET 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Juliusz Chroboczek schrieb:
>> Your example is right in theory, but it's wrong in practice.
>
> I'm not quite sure what to make of this statement. I've been brought up to
> believe that either theory and practice agree, or the theory is wrong.
>
>> Our link quality values on a link are never total stable because of the ETX
>> metric we use. Most times they go up and down by 0.1 or more.
>
> Except on wired networks. You do use cables and/or tunnels, right?
>
>> But we are talking about both problems (the possibility or routing loops to
>> the HNA 0 gateway AND the instable routing metrics) and I hope we will get
>> better solutions for this problems in the next 12 months (much to do, not
>> enough time to do it ;) ).
>
> I'm looking forward to seeing your solution.
>
> In the meantime, I think it'd be a good idea not to recommend the sticky
> gateway feature for general use.
in theory and reality, the mentioned problem does not occour often, as
the hysteresis is only really needed, when you are "in the middle"
between 2 uplinks.
soon as the packet is forwarded in any direction, it is not "in the
middle" anymore and will get forwarded into the right direction.
>
> Juliusz
>
Alex
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkl8tDkACgkQhx2RbV7T5aE5hwCbBej85l0jBysmK1qNAJMRCNI6
NZgAoL7cw/ymJoNkB9ZOKdXIT6C3Qndq
=11YD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Olsr-users
mailing list