[OLSR-users] Question about address assignment
Fri Apr 23 05:46:48 CEST 2004
The UDP packets to 255.255.255.255 should be passed up the stack as far
as I know... You are sure there's no netfilter rule stopping the
I will check this out when I get back to the lab!
> I have modified my OLSR config file to set IP4BROAD to
> 255.255.255.255 and I have attempted to run my systems with IP
> addresses from different subnets, but I am still having trouble.
> I have attached traces from both systems showing the OLSRD debug
> and some tcpdump printouts. The tcpdump shows that the Hello
> messages are being send and seen at the Ethernet interfaces
> of both machines, but the messages don't seem to be getting to
> the OLSR protocol.
> For example:
> 09:49:15.022709 192.168.97.11.698 > 255.255.255.255.698: udp 20 (DF) [tos
> 09:49:21.000156 192.168.77.21.698 > 255.255.255.255.698: udp 20 (DF) [tos
> Could this be because the Linux network stack is filtering out
> messages that do not originate from the same subnet as the
> interface that receives them?
> I would appreciate any ideas you have on this.
> Thank you,
> Richard Herron
> L-3 Communications
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Tønnesen [mailto:(spam-protected)]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 12:56 AM
> To: (spam-protected)
> Cc: (spam-protected)
> Subject: Re: [OLSR-users] Question about address assignment
> You are not the first to ask this question ;-)
> OLSR uses the broadcastaddresses that interfaces are pre-configured
> with. So for two nodes to "hear" eachother they need to use the same
> broadcast address which usually means that they must be on the same
> subnet. This is both good and bad. Good in the sense that it allows for
> subnet design within the manet - bad in the way that it is not very
> "ad-hocish". By "ad-hocish" I mean the idea of nodes roaming freely
> entering and exitting MANETS dynamically.
> AODV specifies in the RFC that ALL control traffic should be broadcasted
> on 255.255.255.255. When using this broadcast address ALL nodes will
> pick up the traffic. OLSR on the other hand does not specify this. So I
> figured it was best leave both options to the user. As a result you can
> set the IP4BROAD option in the configfile to either auto, which will
> cause OLSRd to use the broadcastaddress fetched from the interface(s),
> or you can set it to 255.255.255.255 which causes all controltraffic to
> be broadcasted on 255.255.255.255, meaning that the addresses of your
> nodes does not have to reside within the same subnet.
> I hope this answered your question
> Andreas T
> (spam-protected) wrote:
>>The OLSR code seems to be well written and solid. I have a question
>>about assignment of IP addresses and how addresses are handled by
>>the UniK OLSR daemon.
>>I am running olsrd on Linux machines using an Ethernet interface
>>because I currently have no wireless devices.
>>Section 11.1 of RFC 3626 says:
>>The nodes in the MANET network SHOULD be assigned addresses within a
>>defined address sequence, i.e., the nodes in the MANET SHOULD be
>>addressable through a network address and a netmask.
>>I understand that this is done to enable us to advertise routes
>>from the OLSR MANET into other routing domains, but that it is not
>>I also understand that generally in a MANET there are no requirements
>>as to how addresses are assigned and there may be nodes from different
>>"IP subnets" in the same MANET.
>>I have the following setup:
>> Linux Eth Linux
>> ------- switch -------
>> | | ----- | |
>> | X |______| |________| Y |
>> | | | | | |
>> ------- ----- -------
>>When workstations X and Y are on the same IP subnet (192.168.77.0),
>>OLSR works fine. When they are on differing subnets (X = 192.168.87.0
>>Y = 192.168.97.0) OLSR doesn't work at all.
>>Is this because of the way olsrd is implemented or is it due to the
>>way routing works on Linux, or is my understanding incorrect?
>>Thanks for any help you can give.
>>olsr-users mailing list
UniK University Graduation Center
University of Oslo
More information about the Olsr-users