[Olsr-dev] gateway code

[Henning Rogge]

On 07/24/2012 01:24 PM, Ferry Huberts wrote:
> On 24-07-12 13:22, Henning Rogge wrote:
>> On 07/24/2012 01:15 PM, Teco Boot wrote:
>>> Manual interference with unmanaged tunnels is a request for trouble.
>>> If there is a side effect on tunnel_down (e.g. removed routes), that
>>> is how it is designed. Let's have a clean smart-gw.
>>
>> At the moment there would be no way to restore the route for the tunnel.
>> That is why the mechanism was inside.
>>
>> Similar for mesh interfaces, if they go up again, OLSRd must restore the
>> routes.
> So I think I'm going to revert my changes to that code.
> Agree?

I am not sure if it is really needed, but I dislike the idea that a 
single if-down wrecks your tunnel to the gateway (and most likely your 
internet connection with it!).

What do you think?

Henning Rogge

-- 
Diplom-Informatiker Henning Rogge , Fraunhofer-Institut für
Kommunikation, Informationsverarbeitung und Ergonomie FKIE
Kommunikationssysteme (KOM)
Neuenahrer Straße 20, 53343 Wachtberg, Germany
Telefon +49 228 9435-961,   Fax +49 228 9435 685
mailto:(spam-protected) http://www.fkie.fraunhofer.de
GPG: E1C6 0914 490B 3909 D944 F80D 4487 C67C 55EC CFE0

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6169 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.olsr.org/pipermail/olsr-dev/attachments/20120724/5169fe74/attachment.bin>