[Olsr-dev] [PATCH v1 09/23] kernel_route: olsr_os_inetgw_tunnel_route can now take the table

[Ferry Huberts]

On 13/12/12 11:23, Henning Rogge wrote:
> On 12/13/2012 11:15 AM, Henning Rogge wrote:
>> My other question would be if "table" should be an integer larger than 8
>> bit. Because I think there can be more than 255 routing tables.
>
> Okay, seems to be a kernel version issue... lets keep the 255 maximum
> for the moment (but my comment about the pointer is still valid I think).

I use a pointer to be able to easily signal that it is present or not (I 
want to be able to have 0 as a valid table value)

-- 
Ferry Huberts