[Olsr-dev] Thoughts about an ETX-FF-Metric plugin

[Markus Kittenberger]

Do you put any weight on the seconds in this window?

how would this example be handled

Second  : Received SEquence numbers
1: 1000
2: 1002, 1003
3: 1004,1005,1006
4:
5:
6: 1012
7: 1014,1015

in second 2, i guess the LQ value would be 0.67
in second 1 and 3 it would be 1
but what about 4,5 are they put to 0 in second 6? or earlier? (after 1-2
hello intervals)
which value get second 6, 0.33 (2 of 3 lost), or 0.15 (2 of 6 lost) ?

On 6/18/08, Henning Rogge <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>
> I just did another test implementation of the new algorithm, this one with
> FPM
> and with a sliding window (length fixed to 16 seconds) for calculating the
> average (instead of the exponential moving average).


i think exponential moving average of 5+ second summaries would be better
than of 1 second intervals (if you ever did so)
, also with sliding window 1 second is maybe a bit too short

Test results or more ideas are welcome.
>
>
> Henning
>
> *************************************************
> Diplom Informatiker Henning Rogge
> Forschungsgesellschaft für
> Angewandte Naturwissenschaften e. V. (FGAN)
> Neuenahrer Str. 20, 53343 Wachtberg, Germany
> Tel.: 0049 (0)228 9435-961
> Fax: 0049 (0)228 9435-685
> E-Mail: (spam-protected)
> Web: www.fgan.de
> ************************************************
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bonn
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Bonn VR 2530
> Vorstand: Dr. rer. nat. Ralf Dornhaus (Vors.), Prof. Dr. Joachim Ender
> (Stellv.)
>
> --
> Olsr-dev mailing list
> (spam-protected)
> http://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.olsr.org/pipermail/olsr-dev/attachments/20080618/c51ae5ff/attachment.html>