[Olsr-dev] 0.5.6-rc5 is out

[Hannes Gredler]

Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
>> thats not quite right - if a node vanishes, then the *routes* reachable via
>> that note should go away, _not_ the HNA entry itself.
> 
> ACK, I actually meant that. Or even more precisely: olsrd should
> consider the routes gone as the kernel below may do it on it's own.
> So olsrd can as well delete the routes.

well, thats what we do ... the prpoblem wrt to HNA processing was that
in case of a tc_entry going away, the route state (rt_path) corresponding
to the HNA was never refreshed ...