[Olsr-dev] Seeking comments: OLSR+ETX v/s DSR+ETX

[Alexander Morlang]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Hannes Gredler schrieb:
>>> one of th eissues is its bandwidth agnosticness.
>>> basically a fast-ethernet link get the same etx than
>>> a 1Mbit WLAN link. the ides is to enhance the existing
>>> ETX with an ETT that also factors in the underlying available
>>> bandwidth.
>>>
>>> /hannes
>>>
>> So what you are saying is that the ETX implementation is fine but that
>> it needs to be improved by including a bandwidth component into the
>> metric - essentially ETT.
>
> your understanding is correct. - /hannes
>

instead of telling each other that ETX is fine, i would like to know
what kind of voodoo is meant.

living in freifunk community i alway encounter people telling me, the
greatest shit is fine when you ask such things.

so, it would be nice to see some critics from the outside, what is
voodoo and how "should" it be right?

gruss, Alex
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHZ8jihx2RbV7T5aERAgXeAJ9i+mPiwP93El3+FZo6N2hjphOJMQCghA9h
xpnRwNoezZivKmY3hB9jrb0=
=N/PA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----