[olsr-dev] testbed

[Andreas Tønnesen]

Hi Nikilaos,

That's great to hear. There are quite a few large real-life testbeds 
running olsrd now which is just great! The next release(0.4.8) is just 
around the corner and it will feature _lots_ of new code and therefore 
lots of new bugs ;-) so test feedback is very much appreciated.
The c-base(Berlin)/freifunk community have contributed a brand new and 
very promising link quality routing scheme(much more infor about this 
when 0.4.8 is released) that will be part of 0.4.8 and I think this 
should be very interesting for anybody running mesh networks to try out. 
This kind of stuff is the future of MANET routing IMO!

You'll hear more about 0.4.8 in a matter of days.

- Andreas

Nikolaos Tsarmpopoulos wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Just to let you know that at University of Thessaly (Volos, Greece) we
> are testing olsrd on a steadily growing outdoor, city-wide MANET
> (testbed), based on OpenWRT platform. The network covers an area of 4+
> square Km and we plan to deploy more than 50 nodes in the mid-term.
> 
> If there are test cases we could perform to assist your
> development/debugging work, let me know. 
>  
> BR,
> Nikos
> 
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: (spam-protected) [mailto:(spam-protected)] On
>>Behalf Of aaron
>>Sent: Πέμπτη, 2 Δεκεμβρίου 2004 5:07 μμ
>>To: onelektra
>>Cc: (spam-protected)
>>Subject: Re: [olsr-dev] Re: 0.4.8 and press release
>>
>>On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, onelektra wrote:
>>
>>hi olsr-dev!
>>
>>well, just to let you know - i am currently debugging olsrd-0.4.7 +
> 
> sched
> 
>>fix patch (the patch that andreas recommended to test for our route
>>flapping problem).
>>Basically we still see the same problems in that version.
>>
>>I don't want to hold you back from releasing 0.4.8 but i really think
>>that there is some hard bug in the versions between 0.44 (excluding)
> 
> and
> 
>>the current 0.4.7-schedfix.
>>
>>Would it make sense to hold back 0.4.8 until we have some analysis of
> 
> the
> 
>>problem? Is it a lot of work to release a new version (afterwards)?
>>
>>
>>----
>>
>>Thomas: I thought about your last mail. Unfortunately I did not come
>>around the re-test with the new config file options
>>but... I am pretty sure they our measurement (--debug 9) did not
>>interfere, since the line by itself (at the time of testing :) was
> 
> pretty
> 
>>stable and i collected around 500kbytes of log files while the line
> 
> speed
> 
>>was 600kBytes / sec. So I doubt that re-testing it with the new config
>>settings _in_order_to_ have no interference makes sense. But i will
>>re-test anyway. The symptoms that you saw in the log files were the
> 
> same
> 
>>symptoms that we saw when we logged into the linksys boxes.
>>
>>cheers,
>>aaron
>>
>>
>>>>>onelektra
>>
>>wrote: >> Hi, >>
>>
>>>>>>And, last but not least, Andreas, what are your plans for 0.4.8?
> 
> Do
> 
>>>>>>you
>>>>>>have a release date in your mind?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>No, I don't have anything special in mind. I guess trying to have
> 
> a
> 
>>>>>release ready by monday would leave us with the weekend to get
> 
> things
> 
>>>>>ready. Does this sound good?
>>>>>
>>>>>- Andreas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>yes, I like this date! So are we going to write one text for the
> 
> press
> 
>>>>release in english, publish it on olsr.org, translate it to the
>>
>>languages
>>
>>>>needed, and send it to the media on monday?
>>>>
>>>>cu elektra
>>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>olsr-dev mailing list
>>>(spam-protected)
>>>https://www.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-dev
>>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>olsr-dev mailing list
>>(spam-protected)
>>https://www.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> olsr-dev mailing list
> (spam-protected)
> https://www.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-dev

-- 
Andreas Tønnesen
http://www.olsr.org