[Olsr-cvs] Re: Further olsrd Development

[Andreas Tønnesen]

Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 07:03 +0200, Thomas Lopatic wrote:
>   
>> Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
>>     
>>> On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 12:47 +0200, Andreas Tønnesen wrote:
>>>       
>>>>>   How to accomplish this most easily?
>>>>>   * Just keep sending patches - possibly using `quilt` for patch sets.
>>>>>   * Just send one large patch like the output of `cvs diff` against CVS
>>>>>     HEAD.
>>>>>   * Fill in, please: __________________________________
>>>>>           
>>>>  Giving you CVS access? Just cough up an SF username and I'll add you to
>>>> the project!
>>>>         
>>> I have one already - "bernd67"
>>> Do I want that? I don't know ....
>>>       
>> Considering how much time Andreas and I have been able to spend on olsrd
>>  development during the past few months I'd say, yes, you definitely
>> want that! :-)
>>     
>
> Given that we (Aaron and /me) actually will start to do something sooner
> or later, how sould the release policy continue?
>
> Relase 0.4.12 and branch it there to have some stable part and "we" work
> on the HEAD possibly and IMHO very probably breaking occasionally at
> least the various ports to *BSD, MacOS-X and/or Windows?
>
> Or any other strategy?
>
> 	Bernd
>   
There is already a 0.4 branch and head is supposed to be 0.5. I've
tried maintaining the 0.4 branch with most fixes, but doubtless
not every patch has found it's way in there.
Anyways, as I see it you guys can work on head and the 0.4 branch
will be the "stable" cvs, but perhaps we should consider merging
head into the 0.4 branch now just to make sure all fixes have been
adopted...?


- Andreas