<div dir="ltr">Yes. The firmware does not support it. Only unicast addresses are supported.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Henning Rogge <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hrogge@googlemail.com" target="_blank">hrogge@googlemail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Your problem will be that routing protocols NEED access to the<br>
broadcast/linklocal-multicast address.<br>
<br>
Most radios should support this (on layer 1), because broadcast is a<br>
natural attribute of all wireless connections. Is there a special<br>
reason why your radio does NOT support broadcast?<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Henning<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Breno Silva <<a href="mailto:breno.silva@gmail.com">breno.silva@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> All computer has one ethernet interface with the Radio and the Radio will<br>
> comunicate each other with another Wireless interface.<br>
><br>
> So a node for me is a group of computer+radio<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Henning Rogge <<a href="mailto:hrogge@googlemail.com">hrogge@googlemail.com</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> How many wireless interfaces does computer 2 have? One or two?<br>
>><br>
>> Henning<br>
>><br>
>> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Breno Silva <<a href="mailto:breno.silva@gmail.com">breno.silva@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> wrote:<br>
>> > Right so let's suppose we have this env<br>
>> ><br>
>> > computer1 <-> computer2 <-> computer3<br>
>> ><br>
>> > - Computer1 sends hello msgs to Computer2<br>
>> > - Computer2 sends hello msgs to Computer1 and Computer3<br>
>> > - Computer3 send hello msgs to Computer2<br>
>> ><br>
>> > I suppose all nodes will know theirs neighbors. This is not true ?<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Thanks<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Henning Rogge <<a href="mailto:hrogge@googlemail.com">hrogge@googlemail.com</a>><br>
>> > wrote:<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> That would only work if you have exactly two nodes on an interface,<br>
>> >> the local one and the "other one". In this case you could set the<br>
>> >> broadcast address to the unicast address.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> With more nodes it would not work, because the routing protocol learns<br>
>> >> about the neighbors by listening to the multicast/broadcast packets.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Henning<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Breno Silva <<a href="mailto:breno.silva@gmail.com">breno.silva@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> wrote:<br>
>> >> > i mean If(dst_addr == broadcast)<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > thanks<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Breno Silva <<a href="mailto:breno.silva@gmail.com">breno.silva@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> > wrote:<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> Hello guys,<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> There is a limitation. Looks like the Radio does not work with<br>
>> >> >> broadcast<br>
>> >> >> address. So maybe i can change the function olsr_sento() function to<br>
>> >> >> detect<br>
>> >> >> when the destination addr is broadcast and change it to the unicast<br>
>> >> >> addrs:<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> If(src_addr == broadcast)<br>
>> >> >> for(all unicasts)<br>
>> >> >> sendto(unicast[i])<br>
>> >> >> endif<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> Do you think this hack will work ?<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> Thanks<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> Breno<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Breno Silva <<a href="mailto:breno.silva@gmail.com">breno.silva@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> >> wrote:<br>
>> >> >>><br>
>> >> >>> Thanks Henning,<br>
>> >> >>><br>
>> >> >>> I will be able to test it soon. Then i can give a feedback.<br>
>> >> >>><br>
>> >> >>> Breno<br>
>> >> >>><br>
>> >> >>><br>
>> >> >>> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Henning Rogge<br>
>> >> >>> <<a href="mailto:hrogge@googlemail.com">hrogge@googlemail.com</a>><br>
>> >> >>> wrote:<br>
>> >> >>>><br>
>> >> >>>> As long as you do not reuse the same address, OLSR will work.<br>
>> >> >>>><br>
>> >> >>>> It will set up a host-route (a /32 route) to each of the mesh<br>
>> >> >>>> nodes,<br>
>> >> >>>> which means the different networks do not really matter for OLSR.<br>
>> >> >>>><br>
>> >> >>>> Henning Rogge<br>
>> >> >>>><br>
>> >> >>>> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Breno Silva<br>
>> >> >>>> <<a href="mailto:breno.silva@gmail.com">breno.silva@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> >>>> wrote:<br>
>> >> >>>> > Hello,<br>
>> >> >>>> ><br>
>> >> >>>> > I would like to setup OLSR between some computers, however each<br>
>> >> >>>> > computer is<br>
>> >> >>>> > connected in a Radio (ethernet interface) and they transmit data<br>
>> >> >>>> > to<br>
>> >> >>>> > each<br>
>> >> >>>> > other using a wireless radio interface.<br>
>> >> >>>> ><br>
>> >> >>>> > The radio is Half-Duplex and i already com send IP/UDP data to<br>
>> >> >>>> > each<br>
>> >> >>>> > other.<br>
>> >> >>>> > This is a common flow to send/recv data<br>
>> >> >>>> ><br>
>> >> >>>> > COMPUTER1 (10.1.1.2) <-> (10.1.1.1) RADIO1 ( 192.168.0.1)<br>
>> >> >>>> > <------------------> (192.168.0.2) RADIO2<br>
>> >> >>>> > (10.1.2.1)<br>
>> >> >>>> > <-><br>
>> >> >>>> > COMPUTER2 (10.1.2.2).<br>
>> >> >>>> ><br>
>> >> >>>> > So each computer is a member of different network. I would like<br>
>> >> >>>> > to<br>
>> >> >>>> > know if<br>
>> >> >>>> > the OLSRD will work with this environment.<br>
>> >> >>>> ><br>
>> >> >>>> > Thanks<br>
>> >> >>>> ><br>
>> >> >>>> > Breno<br>
>> >> >>>> ><br>
>> >> >>>> > --<br>
>> >> >>>> > Olsr-users mailing list<br>
>> >> >>>> > <a href="mailto:Olsr-users@lists.olsr.org">Olsr-users@lists.olsr.org</a><br>
>> >> >>>> > <a href="https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users" target="_blank">https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users</a><br>
>> >> >>>><br>
>> >> >>>><br>
>> >> >>>><br>
>> >> >>>> --<br>
>> >> >>>> We began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still. We have<br>
>> >> >>>> lingured<br>
>> >> >>>> long enough on the shores of the cosmic ocean. We are ready at<br>
>> >> >>>> last<br>
>> >> >>>> to<br>
>> >> >>>> set sail for the stars - Carl Sagan<br>
>> >> >>><br>
>> >> >>><br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >> --<br>
>> >> We began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still. We have lingured<br>
>> >> long enough on the shores of the cosmic ocean. We are ready at last to<br>
>> >> set sail for the stars - Carl Sagan<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>> We began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still. We have lingured<br>
>> long enough on the shores of the cosmic ocean. We are ready at last to<br>
>> set sail for the stars - Carl Sagan<br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
We began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still. We have lingured<br>
long enough on the shores of the cosmic ocean. We are ready at last to<br>
set sail for the stars - Carl Sagan<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>