<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Monday 24 September 2012 02:51 PM,
Henning Rogge wrote:<br>
[...]<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:50602607.1020809@fkie.fraunhofer.de"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
You mean all the NICs of a single machine should be in different
subnets
<br>
for OLSR to establish routes properly, right?
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
They should have different subnets to make the IP stack work
properly. Using the same subnet for all interfaces/NICs is a
problem with and without OLSRd.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Ok.<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:50602607.1020809@fkie.fraunhofer.de"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">In that case, while connecting two
machines, if the NICs being part of
<br>
the link have different subnet settings, will OLSR establish
route?
<br>
(assume that this connection happened due to node movement).
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
A group of NICs which might have a connection should share a
subnet.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I agree. However, in a scenario where nodes are <b>mobile</b> and
have (multiple) <b>point to point radio</b> devices (with
directional antennas) for communication between them, is it possible
for the following to occur?<br>
<br>
(Note: I don't have much idea about the radio devices).<br>
<br>
<tt>+-----------------+ +-----------------+
</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>|eth0: 10.1.1.1/16| |eth1: 10.2.1.2/16|
</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>| | | |
</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>| Node1 | | Node2 |
</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>| | | |
</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>|eth1: 10.2.1.1/16|<------>|eth0: 10.1.1.2/16|
</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>+-----------------+ +-----------------+
</tt><tt><br>
</tt><br>
If yes, are there any workarounds? Thank you.<br>
<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Vignesh<br>
</body>
</html>