<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Seen the responses, I recommend you study the OLSR basics first, before you start to modify.<div>Please also read the olsrv2 draft and the new metrics draft (IETF MANET WG) carefully.</div><div><br></div><div>Teco</div><div><br></div><div><br><div><div>Op 18 sep. 2012, om 17:38 heeft <a href="mailto:sarette25@aol.com">sarette25@aol.com</a> het volgende geschreven:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><font color="black" size="2" face="arial">
<div><font style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent">Ok.</font></div>
<div>Thanks.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>So if I modify the code to act like "tc rendundancy = 0":</div>
<div>- only MPRs send TC message </div>
<div>- TC contains only MPR selectors; </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Will this cause problem with the Dijkstra code of OLSRD?</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>--</div>
<div>Sarette<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
<div style="FONT-FAMILY: arial,helvetica; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">-----E-mail d'origine-----<br>
De : Henning Rogge <<a href="mailto:hrogge@googlemail.com">hrogge@googlemail.com</a>><br>
A: sarette25 <<a href="mailto:sarette25@aol.com">sarette25@aol.com</a>><br>
Cc: teco <<a href="mailto:teco@inf-net.nl">teco@inf-net.nl</a>>; olsr-users <<a href="mailto:olsr-users@lists.olsr.org">olsr-users@lists.olsr.org</a>><br>
Envoyé le : Ma, 18 Sep 2012 17:29<br>
Sujet : Re: Re : [Olsr-users] Re : : TC redundancy 0<br>
<br>
<div style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fff; MARGIN: 0px; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, Sans-Serif; COLOR: #000; FONT-SIZE: 12px" id="AOLMsgPart_0_98e84c8b-54ad-40d6-b7cf-080416d6e741"><pre style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt"><tt>At the moment every nodes sends TCs and every node includes every
symmetric neighbor into the TC.
There is also currently no real support for MPRs, which would also
affect the flooding patterns. Every node floods every new packet.
Thats the only supported mode at the moment.
Henning Rogge
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:26 PM, <<a href="mailto:sarette25@aol.com">sarette25@aol.com</a>> wrote:
> Well, sorry I don't understand all.
>
> I am using OLSRD 0.6.2. Any node sends TC messages with its symetric links.
> And the option TC redundancy is set to 2.
>
> So for me, OLSRD uses TC redundancy level 2. And on the code it is written
> that we can't use TC redundancy levels 1 and 2, because a problem with
> Dijkstra.
> There is no flooding optimizations with TC redundancy, because any node
> sends TC message, so all the nodes floods.
> No?
>
>
>
> -----E-mail d'origine-----
> De : Teco Boot <<a href="mailto:teco@inf-net.nl">teco@inf-net.nl</a>>
> A: sarette25 <<a href="mailto:sarette25@aol.com">sarette25@aol.com</a>>
> Cc: hrogge <<a href="mailto:hrogge@googlemail.com">hrogge@googlemail.com</a>>; olsr-users <<a href="mailto:olsr-users@lists.olsr.org">olsr-users@lists.olsr.org</a>>
> Envoyé le : Ma, 18 Sep 2012 17:11
>
> Sujet : Re: [Olsr-users] Re : : TC redundancy 0
>
>
> Op 18 sep. 2012, om 17:00 heeft <a href="mailto:sarette25@aol.com">sarette25@aol.com</a> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Sorry my question is about TC redundancy on OLSRD.
> The option was available but there is a bug with Dijkstra (version 0.5.6). I
> want to know if the bug is fixed or not.
> So if we can use TC redundancy = 0 with OLSRD (0.6.3) ???
>
>
> The description of the defect is not 100% correct.
> OLSR - as specified in RFC - works on minimum hops. Experiments showed that
> using some kind of link metrics works better. In current <a href="http://olsr.org">olsr.org</a> code, ETX
> is implemented. The new OLSRv2 standard incorporates the lessons learned.
> But this needs new algorithms for reduced topology (distinct rules for
> Routing MPR and Flooding MPR). Rules for optimized flooding are still valid.
> Plans are that the next version with fixed optimizations is based on OLSRv2,
> not on something in between.
>
> Teco
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sarette
>
>
> -----E-mail d'origine-----
> De : Henning Rogge <<a href="mailto:hrogge@googlemail.com">hrogge@googlemail.com</a>>
> A: sarette25 <<a href="mailto:sarette25@aol.com">sarette25@aol.com</a>>
> Cc: henning.rogge <<a href="mailto:henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de">henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de</a>>; olsr-users
> <<a href="mailto:olsr-users@lists.olsr.org">olsr-users@lists.olsr.org</a>>
> Envoyé le : Ma, 18 Sep 2012 16:45
> Sujet : Re: [Olsr-users] Re : : TC redundancy 0
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:54 PM, <<a href="mailto:sarette25@aol.com">sarette25@aol.com</a>> wrote:
>> Ok..
>> Well, would you have any information about TC redundancy on OLSRD?
>
> <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3626#section-15.1" target="_blank">http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3626#section-15.1</a>
>
> in short, it decides how many of a nodes neighbors will be put into
> the TC... all of them, just the one who select you as a MPR or both
> your MPRs and the one who select you as an MPR.
>
> Henning Rogge
> --
> Steven Hawkings about cosmic inflation: "An increase of billions of
> billions of percent in a tiny fraction of a second. Of course, that
> was before the present government."
>
> --
> Olsr-users mailing list
> <a href="mailto:Olsr-users@lists.olsr.org">Olsr-users@lists.olsr.org</a>
> <a href="https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users" target="_blank">https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users</a>
>
>
--
Steven Hawkings about cosmic inflation: "An increase of billions of
billions of percent in a tiny fraction of a second. Of course, that
was before the present government."
</tt></pre></div>
<!-- end of AOLMsgPart_0_98e84c8b-54ad-40d6-b7cf-080416d6e741 --></div>
</font></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>