<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>Op 18 sep. 2012, om 15:13 heeft <a href="mailto:sarette25@aol.com">sarette25@aol.com</a> het volgende geschreven:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><font color="black" size="2" face="arial"><font size="2">Why not? ;)<br>
<br>
</font>Be<font size="2">cause I want to test the honestly of each node. And so if a node "Y" sends a TC message with the IP address of "X", I want to verify if "X" has send an HELLO message with a MPR link to "Y"...<br>
</font><font color="black" face="arial" size="2">
<div> But with TC redundancy, I can't.<br></div></font></font></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I do not recommend turning of ETX. But if you did, you could make use of topology reduction.</div><div><br></div><div>I have doubts if your check is allowed. Each node has some freedom to select some MPRs and put something in a TC. One node cannot assume other nodes would make the same decision. Also, because I dislike system-wide configuration and a need for version synchronization.</div><div><br></div><div>Teco</div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><font color="black" size="2" face="arial"><font color="black" face="arial" size="2"><div>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Sarette<br>
</div>
<div> <br>
</div>
<div> <br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:arial,helvetica;font-size:10pt;color:black">-----E-mail d'origine-----<br>
De : Henning Rogge <<a href="mailto:henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de">henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de</a>><br>
A: olsr-users <<a href="mailto:olsr-users@lists.olsr.org">olsr-users@lists.olsr.org</a>><br>
Envoyé le : Ma, 18 Sep 2012 15:01<br>
Sujet : Re: [Olsr-users] TC redundancy 0<br>
<br>
<div id="AOLMsgPart_1_49f349fa-d6a9-4cf9-a680-070c375b7f9e" style="margin: 0px;font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, Sans-Serif;font-size: 12px;color: #000;background-color: #fff;">
<pre style="font-size: 9pt;"><tt>On 09/18/2012 02:56 PM, <a __removedlink__708244310__href="mailto:sarette25@aol.com">sarette25@aol.com</a> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a question about TC redundancy on OLSRD.
> By default, the value of this option is 2. But I don't want to use it.
Is there a reason why you do not want to use it?
Henning Rogge
--
Diplom-Informatiker Henning Rogge , Fraunhofer-Institut für
Kommunikation, Informationsverarbeitung und Ergonomie FKIE
Kommunikationssysteme (KOM)
Fraunhofer Straße 20, 53343 Wachtberg, Germany
Telefon +49 228 9435-961, Fax +49 228 9435 685
<a __removedlink__708244310__href="mailto:henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de?">mailto:henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de</a> <a __removedlink__708244310__href="http://www.fkie.fraunhofer.de" target="_blank">http://www.fkie.fraunhofer.de</a>
</tt></pre>
</div>
<!-- end of AOLMsgPart_1_49f349fa-d6a9-4cf9-a680-070c375b7f9e -->
<div id="AOLMsgPart_3_49f349fa-d6a9-4cf9-a680-070c375b7f9e" style="margin: 0px;font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, Sans-Serif;font-size: 12px;color: #000;background-color: #fff;">
<pre style="font-size: 9pt;"><tt>--
Olsr-users mailing list
<a __removedlink__708244310__href="mailto:Olsr-users@lists.olsr.org">Olsr-users@lists.olsr.org</a>
<a __removedlink__708244310__href="https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users" target="_blank">https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users</a>
</tt></pre>
</div>
<!-- end of AOLMsgPart_3_49f349fa-d6a9-4cf9-a680-070c375b7f9e -->
</div>
</font></font>-- <br>Olsr-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Olsr-users@lists.olsr.org">Olsr-users@lists.olsr.org</a><br>https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users</blockquote></div><br></body></html>