<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>Op 18 sep. 2012, om 17:00 heeft <a href="mailto:sarette25@aol.com">sarette25@aol.com</a> het volgende geschreven:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><font color="black" size="2" face="arial">
<div>Sorry my question is about TC redundancy on OLSRD.</div>
<div>The option was available but there is a bug with Dijkstra (version 0.5.6). I want to know if the bug is fixed or not.</div>
<div>So if we can use TC redundancy = 0 with OLSRD (0.6.3) ???</div></font></blockquote><div><br></div>The description of the defect is not 100% correct.</div><div>OLSR - as specified in RFC - works on minimum hops. Experiments showed that using some kind of link metrics works better. In current <a href="http://olsr.org">olsr.org</a> code, ETX is implemented. The new OLSRv2 standard incorporates the lessons learned. But this needs new algorithms for reduced topology (distinct rules for Routing MPR and Flooding MPR). Rules for optimized flooding are still valid.</div><div>Plans are that the next version with fixed optimizations is based on OLSRv2, not on something in between.</div><div><br></div><div>Teco</div><div><br></div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><font color="black" size="2" face="arial">
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>--</div>
<div>Sarette</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div style="FONT-FAMILY: arial,helvetica; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">-----E-mail d'origine-----<br>
De : Henning Rogge <<a href="mailto:hrogge@googlemail.com">hrogge@googlemail.com</a>><br>
A: sarette25 <<a href="mailto:sarette25@aol.com">sarette25@aol.com</a>><br>
Cc: henning.rogge <<a href="mailto:henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de">henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de</a>>; olsr-users <<a href="mailto:olsr-users@lists.olsr.org">olsr-users@lists.olsr.org</a>><br>
Envoyé le : Ma, 18 Sep 2012 16:45<br>
Sujet : Re: [Olsr-users] Re : : TC redundancy 0<br>
<br>
<div style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fff; MARGIN: 0px; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, Sans-Serif; COLOR: #000; FONT-SIZE: 12px" id="AOLMsgPart_0_22792fc4-ed7e-49c5-8011-2023ff27e37d"><pre style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt"><tt>On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:54 PM, <<a href="mailto:sarette25@aol.com">sarette25@aol.com</a>> wrote:
> Ok..
> Well, would you have any information about TC redundancy on OLSRD?
<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3626#section-15.1" target="_blank">http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3626#section-15.1</a>
in short, it decides how many of a nodes neighbors will be put into
the TC... all of them, just the one who select you as a MPR or both
your MPRs and the one who select you as an MPR.
Henning Rogge
--
Steven Hawkings about cosmic inflation: "An increase of billions of
billions of percent in a tiny fraction of a second. Of course, that
was before the present government."
</tt></pre></div>
<!-- end of AOLMsgPart_0_22792fc4-ed7e-49c5-8011-2023ff27e37d --></div>
</font>-- <br>Olsr-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Olsr-users@lists.olsr.org">Olsr-users@lists.olsr.org</a><br>https://lists.olsr.org/mailman/listinfo/olsr-users</blockquote></div><br></body></html>